Conference fund raiser - Changing the world for the better through a 21st century scientific discovery

The model that I have developed suggests we have misunderstood the functionality of atomic theory because we have used an incorrect model for quark charge calculations. By calculating that atoms contain charge on the basis of fractions and adding these together makes the atom look piece meal and not a coherent whole. Biology is best looked at in a wholistic way to see the complexity. A new atom model would do what? Offer an alternative perspective. The He-BEC model is a simple model for ignoring many complexities when it comes to atomic theory. That is because only a single wavelength at the ground state occurs in the Bose Einstein Condensate. How to dumb down the atomic structure so a biologist like me can see if in a very simple wave and not the quantum mechanics wavefunction with too many moving parts. I like KISS (keep it simple stupid) in order to avoid being overly complicated. No moving parts. Just looking things in a way where I have one language to consider. The model is helpful because it shows how atoms are formed, and this makes the adding of fractions not so useful. I prefer the multiplication (go forward and multiply), I consider this to mean we should use multiplication for the quark charge calculations. Differences in perspectives offers insight through comparisons with previous approaches. Take a look at the video. Thanks again for your help to get to Spain.