Further info:
It is clearly stated that the area in question is marked in red, with potential future expansion (as this development could possibly set a precedent) marked in orange.
QLDC’s planner initially recommended the consent be refused, later changing his mind saying consent COULD be granted given certain benchmarks were met. However as not all of these benchmarks were achieved, his recommendation to the Commissioner’s hearing was that consent be refused (Council’s S42A report). QLDC's Landscape Architect also recommended to refuse consent.
The developer originally applied for resource consent on a non-notified basis but was forced to publicly notify it after receiving an unfavorable planning report from QLDC. Ref: https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/queenstown/development-be-publicly-notified-after-poor-report
The application attracted 24 public submissions, 4 in favour, 20 opposed. 2 other separate parties provided written consent (6 parties provided written consent but 4 of those also submitted in favour). Of those 26 submissions, nearly all are full-time local residents.
A Commissioner’s hearing was set down & completed on 30.11.2022. Based on the evidence provided at the hearing QLDC decided to refuse consent on 16.12.2022. Refer e-docs RM210618.
We stand by our view that an intensive development of this nature has no place in Bob's Cove-Punatapu. If anyone has any further questions or concerns about the info provided please email us at punatapu.charity@gmail.com