Get the Board of Review to assess the OFLC's decision to ban Gal*Gun: Double Peace

$104 of $200 goal
Given by 5 generous donors in 7 days

I'm seeking a review of the decision to ban the game Gal*Gun: Double Peace, and need help with fees involved.

Wellington

In January, the Office of Film and Literature Classification ruled the video game Gal*Gun: Double Peace "Objectionable" - in other words, it's banned in New Zealand.

I and many others I've spoken to don't think this is a fair ruling. There's no argument that Gal*Gun is a lewd game that will be offensive to many, but it's far from harmful enough to warrant a ban. That's an extreme step that should only be used in the most extreme circumstances, and I don't believe Gal*Gun fits the bill.

In my view, the Chief Censor's ruling misrepresents the game in order to justify an "Objectionable" rating under Section 3 of the Film, Videos, and Publications Classification Act. It doesn't account for the game's tone and satirical elements, and exaggerates the sexual content.

It's not a game that many will like, but it has a right to exist per freedom of expression protections in the Bill of Rights Act. I believe there's more value to be had in it being available, so that people can analyse, critique, and learn, than in banning it for the sake of the public good.

I've put in a request for the Film and Literature Board of Review to review the ruling.

IMPORTANT NOTE: This doesn't guarantee a change in the rating, as that is up to the Board of Review's judgement, and the fee needs to be paid regardless of the outcome.

A review would at least gives the game another chance.

I've gone into more detail about why I don't think a ban is appropriate in an article published on The Spinoff: http://thespinoff.co.nz/games/02-02-2017/the-banning-of-galgun-double-peace-did-the-chief-censor-get-it-wrong/

A few other perspectives:

http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/2017/02/censorship-should-not-be-left-to-censors.html

http://thespinoff.co.nz/games/02-02-2017/the-banning-of-galgun-double-peace-a-deep-dive-into-the-law/

http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/2016/08/on-galgun-double-peace-and-satire-its.html

http://www.shindig.nz/gaming/gal-gun-double-peace-review/

http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/2016/05/play-asia-review-galgun-double-peace.html

Matthew Codd's involvement (page creator)

I value the importance of artistic freedom, and think that banning an artwork is something that should only be done in extreme circumstances.

Use of funds

The funds will be used to pay the Film and Literature Board of Review's fee for a review of a classification decision. The fee is $204.44, which is a reduced fee for members of the public with no commercial interest in the game.

Read more

Latest donations

Graeme Edgeler
Graeme Edgeler on 20 Feb 2017
Let me know if you need any free legal advice :-)
$29.44
DM
DM on 17 Feb 2017
I'm not a fan of the series but based on context, and Australia not banning it it hard to justify this games banning.
$25
A great cause
A great cause on 14 Feb 2017
Censorship should never be tolerated. Thanks, Matt.
$10
Food4Dogs
Food4Dogs on 14 Feb 2017
It's important we all stand up for freedom of artistic expression.
$20
Matthew
Matthew on 14 Feb 2017
$20

Who's involved?

Matthew Codd's avatar
Created by, and paying to a verified bank account of, Matthew Codd on behalf of New Zealanders with an interest in art and free expression
Page Moderated
The page has been checked by our team to make sure it complies with our terms and conditions.

Any concerns?

Report this page
This campaign started on 14 Feb 2017 and ended on 21 Feb 2017.